Funded Projects

Understanding municipal policies that influence implementation of effective evidence-based practices (EBPs) as well as effective strategies for working with municipal groups may inform local efforts to translate EBPs. Just as important, engaging with local stakeholders may help to facilitate the long-term sustainability of EBPs. This can only occur if diverse local actors in municipal governance are thinking about health and behavioral health in the context of municipal planning and policy. Building from research related opioid use disorder and the risk environment, built environment, and zoning, this research will work to support coalition-based approach currently implemented by the HEALing Communities Study. The research aims to develop an understanding of local policies that may affect implementation of community action plans in the HEALing Communities Study Massachusetts communities.

The opioid epidemic in the United States is associated with alarming rates of overdose and overdose deaths. Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT), in combination with psychosocial intervention, is the most effective treatment for OUD; however, many individuals are unable to access treatment, are not sufficiently retained in treatment, or experience barriers that prohibit their participation in treatment. A multipronged approach is needed that includes 1) development of integrated networks of care, both formal and informal, to better address the needs of individuals with OUDs and 2) measures of the efficacy of these integrated networks for addressing the needs of individuals with OUD. This project will build a learning collaborative to address gaps in knowledge about the delivery, sustainability, and assessment of recovery service for individuals on MAT. The collaborative will foster collaboration and communication between stakeholders and with the larger community of research and providers interested in improving the delivery of OUD recovery support services. This community-academic partnership will address the lack of evidence regarding effective recovery support services.

While advances in cancer treatment have increased survival rates, these patients often suffer from chronic cancer pain. Prescription opioids are often prescribed during active cancer treatment, but their long-term use for chronic cancer pain is associated with risk for opioid use disorder and risk for stigmatization associated with emotional distress, suboptimal health behaviors and coping strategies, and difficult patient-provider communication. This study aims to conduct qualitative interviews exploring prescription opioid and chronic pain stigma in cancer survivors with moderate-to-severe pain, caregivers, and clinicians who treat patients with chronic cancer pain, including oncologists, primary care providers, pain management specialists, and palliative care physicians. An analysis of potential contributors to stigma in cancer survivors will be completed to support development of multi-level behavioral interventions to reduce stigma and explore long-term health outcomes from such interventions.

Among the more than half-million adults entering addiction treatment for prescription opioid abuse every year, 50%-60% report co-morbid chronic pain, and 80% report that pain triggers relapse. Individualized/self-stigma among adults with substance abuse has been shown to lead to delayed recovery, increased relapse and reduced treatment-related attendance. Stigma may induce significant burden on patients with OUD and chronic pain and there may be unique characteristics of stigma for this population due to the overlap between medical treatment and substance abuse. Multiple sources of stigma may be imposed including internalized/self-stigma as well as intragroup/peer-to-peer (?horizontal?) stigma whereby peers impose stigma upon each other based on the type and severity of past drug use. Furthermore, stigma could be ?vertical? in that stigma may be enacted by health care providers or by treatment center staff. However, there is notably a lack of research and related assessment tools to measure these multidimensional facets of stigma, particularly in patients with OUD and chronic pain. The investigators will utilize a mixed-methods approach to evaluate internalized/self-stigma, anticipated/expected stigma and enacted stigma using existing standardized surveys, and to describe horizontal and vertical stigma in individuals with OUD and pain at multiple sites. In addition, the investigators will integrate the quantitative and qualitative information to help inform modifications to the psychotherapy component (I-STOP) of the parent award intervention, which would then also target multidimensional stigma in patients with OUD and chronic pain.

Stigma is a key barrier to retention in medication-based treatment for opioid use disorder, particularly among low-income, minority individuals. Stigma that exists at multiple levels contributes to poor retention in care, including internalized and anticipated stigma at the individual level, as well as enacted stigma at the health care provider- and community levels. There is an urgent need to develop and evaluate innovative strategies to reduce stigma at these multiple levels among low-income, racial/ethnic minority individuals to improve engagement in care. One of the most promising strategies to reduce multiple intersecting stigmas simultaneously and improve engagement in care for low-income, minority individuals is through the use of peer recovery coaches (PRCs). PRCs, individuals who have gone through the recovery process themselves and are typically state-certified, have been shown to be more acceptable for engaging and retaining low-income, racial/ethnic minority patients in treatment compared to other health workers. However, scarce research has formally evaluated the effects of PRCs on stigma. This study will test how a PRC model can reduce multiple intersecting stigmas among low-income, racial/ethnic minority individuals to improve retention in methadone treatment.

The opioid epidemic has increased the demand for a research workforce with the necessary expertise and skills to conceptualize and carry out studies to expand and improve treatment options for opioid use disorders (OUDs). In particular, as the NIDA-funded Clinical Trials Network (CTN) expands the number of nodes and takes on additional studies as part of the HEAL Initiative, the need for an increasing number of staff who are familiar with the CTN research environment is amplified, and opportunities to provide a platform for training new investigators interested in the OUD area are increased. The CTN Research workforce development and dissemination program will provide multi-modal training, including didactic, experiential, and mentoring, to prepare research staff (regulatory personnel, study coordinators, project managers), post-doctoral fellows and faculty from a variety of disciplines (MD, PhD, PharmD, Nurse Practitioners, etc.) to participate in HEAL Initiative studies being conducted within the CTN.

Less than half of youth in the juvenile justice system who meet the criteria for substance use disorders (SUD) have ever received treatment, and less than one third of those received treatment while under community or correctional supervision. SUDs during adolescence can lead to significantly longer periods of substance use, more severe offending, and penetration in the justice system. The Translational Research on Interventions for Adolescents in the Legal System (TRIALS) cooperative is intended to develop and test implementation strategies and associated measures to improve the continuum of substance abuse and HIV prevention and treatment services delivered to youth under juvenile justice supervision.

A large number of individuals under criminal justice supervision with opioid use disorders (OUDs) have limited access to pharmacotherapy treatment, an intervention found to reduce substance use, HIV-risk behavior, and criminal activity. This randomized clinical trial will assess the effectiveness of an extended-release buprenorphine (XR-B) formulation compared to extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) in county jail inmates prior to release. Understanding how to expand acceptance of medications for OUD, particularly long-acting medications, in jails has far-reaching implications for treatment expansion in this population.

People who use opioids in rural areas suffer worse health and less insurance coverage. The opioid problem in rural areas is of particular concern, as rural areas have higher overdose rates despite equivalent rates of OUD. This is because rural areas have a scant number of clinics and clinicians who provide medication treatment for OUD. Thus, people living in rural areas must travel long distances to access clinics that may or may not have expertise in providing treatment to patients with OUD. Telemedicine (TM) could efficiently increase capacity for delivery of buprenorphine in rural areas and may increase the number of patients receiving medication treatment and improve treatment retention and outcomes. While the development of medication treatments for opioid use disorder (MOUD) capacity in primary care settings with optimal/comprehensive services is desirable, the current opioid crisis with escalating overdose death rates in rural areas suggests a need to implement an efficient, cost-effective system of MOUD services that can be scaled up quickly. The use of a centralized and Medicare-covered TM vendor utilizing a developed methodology and established organizational infrastructure offers the great potential for a rapid rollout to increase access to MOUD and improve treatment retention in rural areas. This cluster randomized clinical trial with two phases will test expanded treatment access to improve retention on MOUD in highly affected rural areas. Phase I will include implementing telemedicine in a limited number of rural sites with varying levels of office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) to inform implementation strategies for the main trial, and Phase II will include evaluate comparative effectiveness between OBOT alone and OBOT + TM at 30 sites.

Although there are effective prevention and treatment programs and services to address opioid misuse, opioid use disorder (OUD), and overdose, gaps remain between those needing and those receiving prevention and treatment, in part because of a need to better understand how to make these programs and services most effective at a local level. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) launched the HEALing Communities Study to generate evidence about how tools for preventing and treating opioid misuse and OUD are most effective at the local level. This multisite implementation research study will test the impact of an integrated set of evidence-based practices across health care, behavioral health, justice, and other community-based settings. The goal of the study is to reduce opioid-related overdose deaths by 40 percent over three years. Boston Medical Center is partnering with academic institutions in three other states to study the impact of these efforts in 67 highly affected communities. The study will also look at the effectiveness of coordinated systems of care designed to increase the number of individuals receiving medication to treat OUD, increase the distribution of naloxone, and reduce high-risk opioid prescribing.

The U.S. is in the midst of a devastating opioid epidemic. Since 1999, the number of overdose (OD) deaths involving opioids has quadrupled. These trends are magnified among American Indians/Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) compared to other racial/ethnic groups. AI/ANs are second only to Whites in the rate of OD mortality (8/100,000 versus 12/100,000 deaths, respectively). Medications for opioid use disorder (OUD; i.e., methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone) are considered the most effective treatment, reducing mortality and increasing abstinence and retention. However, numerous barriers limit the uptake of medications for OUD in tribal communities and within urban treatment settings serving AI/AN individuals. This is a two-phase formative research study to develop and test an implementation intervention for programs to provide medications to treat OUD specifically with AI/AN consumers. The objective of Phase I (12 months) is to develop a culturally centered implementation intervention to integrate medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) into health care/addiction specialty settings. The objective of Phase II (24 months) is to conduct a preliminary test of the implementation intervention at four sites serving AI/AN communities. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) methods will be used throughout both phases. This study will help with decreasing stigma and increase the utilization of MOUD in health care settings that serve AI/AN populations.

Community pharmacies are optimal—yet underutilized—settings for identifying individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) and increasing their access to treatment. Approximately 93 percent of individuals in the U.S. live within 5 miles of a community pharmacy. The most common opioid-related tool available to pharmacists is the prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP), which provides highly limited information and support for clinical decision making. Appriss Health, the largest U.S. PDMP vendor, covering 42 states, has developed an opioid risk measure, the NarxScore. This study will clinically validate the NarxScore metric and identify high, moderate and low opioid risk thresholds to inform OUD care management within urban and rural community pharmacies. This is a prospective cross-sectional comprehensive OUD risk and behavioral/physical health survey administered electronically with patients (n = 1,523) filling opioid medications in urban/rural community pharmacies in Ohio (pharmacy sites: n = 12) and Indiana (pharmacy sites: n = 3), states that continue to have disproportionately high rates of overdose and opioid prescribing. Correlation, regression and kappa statistics will be calculated for validation; receiver operating curves with sensitivity/specificity values will be employed for threshold identification (with >95 percent power to detect an area of 0.7 under the curve value).

Hospital inpatient stays due to opioid-related health problems are a reachable moment for increasing access to treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) are at particularly high risk for morbidity, mortality, and high medical costs in the U.S. This study will substantially inform the care management of OUD in hospitalized patients. The project includes a comparative effectiveness research trial and an implementation research trial, which will lead to models of broad dissemination for treatment approaches to this largely unaddressed population. They will examine whether (1) in hospitals with addiction medicine consultation services, hospital-initiated extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP), compared with other OUD medications, results in increased engagement in treatment with MOUD following hospital discharge and (2) training hospitals without such consultation services on best practices for initiating MOUD using consultation service hubs improves medication uptake in hospitals and increased MOUD treatment engagement following discharge.